A difficult moment with poor tools
After in-person or online harm, young people and the adults supporting them may struggle to organize context, understand choices, and track follow-up without collecting more sensitive material.
Safe Harbor is developing a bounded child-safety product for the confusing period during and after an in-person or online incident. Safe Harbor would help young people organize their own account, understand options, select a possible helper, and track follow-up while retaining control over unnecessary disclosure.
After in-person or online harm, young people and the adults supporting them may struggle to organize context, understand choices, and track follow-up without collecting more sensitive material.
Safe Harbor is designed to help a young person create a minimal account, review every detail, explore possible helpers, and preserve a visible record of decisions.
The intended model rejects secret monitoring, automatic accusations, hidden sharing, harmful-media collection, and claims that software can determine guilt or safety.
Investors and partners can inspect the public concept, interaction boundaries, research questions, development plan, accessibility approach, and feedback workflow.
A functional browser sandbox with fictional scenarios and accessibility preferences.
Privacy, authority, evidence, crisis, and accessibility requirements are being developed and reviewed.
No public claims of product efficacy, validated demand, completed pilots, or production readiness.
These are proposed uses, not a completed financing plan or commitment.
Independent child-safety, clinical, legal, privacy, security, and accessibility review
Research with qualified safeguarding oversight and meaningful disabled-user participation
Production-grade local-first engineering, threat modeling, and assistive-technology testing
Carefully bounded pilots with schools, advocates, counselors, and youth-serving organizations
Evidence generation that can falsify product assumptions before wider deployment
Public-interest access pathways that do not require surveillance-based monetization
Potentially aligned partners include mission-driven investors, child-safety and accessibility funders, research collaborators, responsible-technology programs, philanthropic capital, and organizations able to support bounded pilots.
Not aligned: surveillance monetization, hidden parental access, automated accusations, engagement-maximizing design, or pressure to bypass independent review.
Use this form for business and partnership inquiries only. It opens your email application so you can review everything before sending.